Comments on: Second Life Quickies: A Disastrous Virtual Sex Speedrun

By: Jess

Jess — Tue, 13 Jan 2026 07:40:55 +0000

In reply to Kitten. Aha, yeah I'm not a big fan of long, drawn-out morning sex in SL too. I need at least a few hours to get myself together and wake up properly.

By: Jess

Jess — Tue, 13 Jan 2026 07:40:02 +0000

In reply to Lola1990. Interesting. I'm generally not a fan of voice unless it's a paid session. But now I'm curious about whether it's hotter in quickie format. I may need to give this a try!

By: Kitten

Kitten — Tue, 13 Jan 2026 05:50:10 +0000

I think people look down on quickies in SL but they’re great if you do them right. I’m not a fan of lengthy morning sex but I love a good, fast morning quickie. The only downside is if you aren’t careful, it can feel empty and like the other person is just using you to get off. You have to stay connected even if it’s fast. That being said, anything is better than getting stuck with a “novelist.” I can’t stand it when someone drops a massive block of text describing five entirely irrelevant objects like the stitching on their boots or the grain of the wood floor while I’m just sitting there waiting to reply. It’s usually one giant run-on sentence too that backs you into a corner so you have literally no choice but to do exactly what they want. And don’t get me started on the people who have their next massive reply ready to paste the second you hit enter. It feels so robotic. I really prefer short, punchy replies so quickies are perfect in that way.

By: Lola1990

Lola1990 — Tue, 13 Jan 2026 01:32:42 +0000

Depends on who it is. Most of the time they’re selfish and just want to get off but voice quickies are a different story I’ve had some really exciting ones.